Bermudez
A-
provisional — 100% — 5.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Arora v. Arora CA4/1
- Bryan v. County of San Diego Sheriff's Dept. CA4/1
- Salmer v. Southern Cal. Permanente Medical Group CA4/1
- Howard v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles CA4/1
- People v. Estrada CA4/1
- Doe v. County of San Diego CA4/1
- People v. Martinez CA4/1
- In re M.R. CA4/1
- In re A.J. CA4/1
- People v. Mercado CA4/1
- Marriage of Prince CA4/1
- People v. Gordon CA4/1
- People v. Coronado CA4/1
- People v. Whitehurst CA4/1
- Prince v. Prince CA4/1
- People v. Ayala CA4/1
- People v. McDonnell CA4/1
- In re W.J. CA4/1
- Isolate Innovations v. Lisenko CA4/1
- In re A.S. CA4/1
- In re G.T. CA4/1
- People v. Porter CA4/1
- People v. Vaughn CA4/1
- Gutierrez v. City of Imperial CA4/1
- In re M.F. CA4/1