William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Swift v. Arents
- Ransom v. Farish
- Cunningham v. Breed
- Benedict v. Cozzens
- Beck v. City of San Francisco
- Johnson v. Gordon
- Ruiz v. Norton
- Ruiz v. Norton
- Reed v. McCormick
- People v. Nugent
- Beach v. Farish
- McDonald v. Mountain Lake Water Co.
- Redding v. Bell
- Jessup v. King
- Whiting v. Heslep
- Thorne v. Yontz
- Nugent v. Locke
- Vinton v. Crowe
- Eberhard v. Tuolumne Water Co.
- Moraga v. Emeric
- Moody v. McDonald
- Shafer v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.
- Fitzgerald v. Gorham
- Watson v. McClay
- Bequette v. Caulfield