gno.law

Ransom v. Farish

California Supreme Court · · 1854-10-15 · Published · 4 Cal. 386

L. W. RANSOM v. FARISH and McLAREN

Area
civil
Panel
Heydeneeldt (author), William J. Murray, Jr., Richard L. Wells

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Heydeneeldt

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray and Mr. J. Wells concurred.

The guaranty of Adams to Josselyn was the act of the defendants, upon the maxim, “qui facit per (Mum, fácil per se,”

The facts show accord and satisfaction of the judgment, and so the Court very properly found.

Judgment, affirmed.