William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Oroville Hospital v. Superior Court
- People v. Pillsbury
- Legal Aid Society of San Mateo v. Dept. of Finance
- Carroll v. Commission on Teacher Credentialing
- Shipp v. Western Engineering, Inc.
- Marriage of Mullonkal & Kodiyamplakkil
- People v. Mora-Duran
- City of Santa Maria v. Cohen
- Berman v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
- People v. Silva
- Mountjoy v. Bank of America, N.A.
- Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
- Jimenez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.
- Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & Wildlife
- People v. Phoenix
- Fresholtz v. Board of Trustees