Jessup v. King
RICHARD M. JESSUP v. JAMES L. KING
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Hexdeneeldt (author), William J. Murray, Jr.
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Hexdeneeldt
Mr. J. Hexdeneeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.
Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.
There is nothing in the record which shows the-character of the proposed amendment to the answer, and we ava *332[332] therefore * unable to say that the Court erred in-refusing the application to amend; the presumption is the other way.
The evidence, which is excluded, would have been proper under a plea of payment pids darrein continuance, but without such plea, it was irrelevant to the issue, and therefore, inadmissible.
Judgment affirmed.