McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Thomas CA4/1
- Gonzalez v. Rebollo
- Corona v. Dept. of Transportation CA4/1
- People v. Flores CA4/1
- In re A.B. CA4/1
- In re Michael H. CA4/1
- People v. Riley CA4/1
- Jasmine B. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- People v. Vargas CA4/1
- Helping Hand Tools v. San Diego Air Pollution Cont. Dist. etc. CA4/1
- Gonzalez v. Rebollo CA4/1
- Stahl Law Firm v. Apex Medical Technologies CA4/1
- Sznyter v.Spun.com Inc. CA4/1
- San Diego Apartment Brokers v. California Capital Ins. Co. CA4/1
- Little v. Nau CA4/1
- People v. Montes CA4/1
- In re Ferguson CA4/1
- Ramos v. Oatey CA4/1
- Klemke v. ISEC, Inc. CA4/1
- People v. King CA4/1
- In re T.J. CA4/1
- In re Jake R. CA4/1
- In re M.W. CA4/1
- Montague v. AMN Healthcare
- People v. Super. Ct.