William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Butler v. Howes
- Bell v. Walsh
- Phillips v. Mayer
- Nougues v. Douglass
- Whitwell v. Barbier
- Hoffman v. Stone
- Live Yankee Co. v. Oregon Co.
- Covillaud v. Tanner
- Pico v. Carillo
- Billings v. Hall
- Easterling v. Power
- Doran v. Walker
- Morse v. McCarty
- Robles v. Robles
- Meyer v. Adler
- Spencer v. Barney
- White v. Prader
- Berri v. Fitch
- Earl v. George
- Dugan v. Adams & Co.
- White v. Williams
- Berri v. Minturn
- Macy v. Wheeler
- Peck v. Powell
- Gates v. Teague