Earl v. George
WILLIAM EARL v. THOMAS GEORGE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author), William J. Murray, Jr.
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
TERRY, J.
— The facts of this case as they appear from the record are not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. *53It does not appear that the amount in controversy exceeds two hundred dollars.
Appeal dismissed.
I concur: Murray, C. J.