McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Calderon CA4/1
- P.O.P. Enterprises v. Lively CA4/1
- People v. Jimenez CA4/1
- People v. Aceituno CA4/1
- K.F. v. Superior Court
- People v. Parish CA4/1
- In re M.A. CA4/1
- In re Andre B. CA4/1
- Site Management Services v. Cingular Wireless CA4/1
- Sharma v. Goswami CA4/1
- People v. Holiday CA4/1
- J.J. v. Co. of San Diego
- People v. Lee CA4/1
- People v. Mulvany CA4/1
- People v. Collins CA4/1
- People v. Pennings CA4/1
- Owens v. Thayer CA4/1
- Tinoco v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. CA4/1
- Jacqueline C. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- People v. Consiglio CA4/1
- Buser v. Buser CA4/1
- In re J.H. CA4/1
- People v. Daniel CA4/1
- In re Michael T. CA4/1
- People v. Gastelum CA4/1