Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Nejad v. LaRose
- Ewing v. Gitre
- Winfield v. Strauss
- STA Pharmaceuticals US, LLC v. Nguyen
- Palomar Health v. N Health Network Partners, LLC
- Thomas v. Doe
- Ryan v. Best In Slot LLC
- Ryan v. Best In Slot LLC
- Woodway USA, Inc. v. LifeCORE Fitness, LLC
- Tucker v. Johnson
- Dragasits v. Archuleta
- Smith v. TransUnion
- Bender v. U.S. Department of Transportation
- Murphy v. Bisignano
- Wolinski v. Moseley
- Braswell v. San Diego Police Department
- Stephens v. United States Corporation
- Residential Energy Services Network, Inc. v. Building Science Institute, Ltd. Co.
- Egharevba v. Central SDHC FHA LLC
- Bender v. U.S. Department of Transportation
- Camargo Alejo v. Vista Detention Facility
- Hearn v. Warden
- Kinnally v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- Intrepid Automation, Inc. v. 3D Systems Corporation
- Ossa v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.