Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Sethman v. Bulkley
- Melendez v. City of Los Angeles
- People v. Perkins
- Tuttle v. Crawford
- Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior Court
- Max Factor & Co. v. Kunsman
- Douglass v. City of Los Angeles
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Mantz
- Union Oil Associates v. Johnson
- In Re San Francisco Chronicle
- Smith v. Pacific Greyhound Corp.
- Musto-Keenan Co. v. City of Los Angeles
- Crutchett v. Lawton
- Cameron v. Feather River Forest Homes
- People v. Webb Bros.
- Paige v. Reinecke
- New York Indemnity Co. v. Western Loan & Building Co.
- Bland v. Smith
- Gallatin v. Markowitz
- Stenderup v. Broadway State Bank
- Sunder v. Collins
- Howe v. Tucker
- In Re Estate of Hartson
- Moulton v. Williams Fruit Corp.
- Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.