Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.
WILLIAM RISHEBARGER v. STOCKWELL-KLING CORPORATION (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Thompson, Ira
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Thompsonira
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stoclcwell-Kling Corp., ante, p. 192 [17 Pac. (2d) 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.
Works, P. J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933.
Cites, in this corpus
- Iske v. Stockwell-Kling Corp. Docket No. 8663. · 1932-12-14