Thompson
A+
provisional — 100% — 3.0 of 3 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 6% of 27 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 3 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Zuniga CA4/3
- Medina v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC
- Beltran v. Golden CA4/3
- Medina v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC
- Goodfield v. Frahm CA4/3
- Luther v. Delabar CA4/3
- People v. Young CA4/3
- Stiles v. Bank of New York Mellon CA4/3
- Lorta v. Bishop, Inc. CA4/3
- Rocco v. SAP America CA4/3
- Ashby v. Ashby
- Wymont Services Limited v. Handal & Associates CA4/3
- People v. Hernandez CA4/3
- Amjadi v. Brown
- People v. Tran CA4/3
- People v. Henderson CA4/3
- Vision En Analisis Y Estrategia S.A. De C.V. v. Erwin Legal, P.C. CA4/3
- Ashby v. Ashby CA4/3
- People v. Mendoza CA4/3
- People v. Lopez CA4/3
- People v. Reyes CA4/3
- People v. Sanchez CA4/3
- People v. Lopez
- Marriage of Waldron CA4/3
- Slovenec v. Masson & Fatini CA4/3