Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Zuniga CA4/3
- People v. Young CA4/3
- Ashby v. Ashby
- Wymont Services Limited v. Handal & Associates CA4/3
- People v. Hernandez CA4/3
- People v. Henderson CA4/3
- Vision En Analisis Y Estrategia S.A. De C.V. v. Erwin Legal, P.C. CA4/3
- Ashby v. Ashby CA4/3
- People v. Mendoza CA4/3
- People v. Lopez CA4/3
- People v. Reyes CA4/3
- L.R. v. Superior Court CA4/3
- Medina v. Superior Court
- Yebba v. AHMC Healthcare CA4/3
- SCSA Group v. Worden CA4/3
- Brodkin v. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange CA4/3
- Chmait v. Heritage Asset Management CA4/3
- Jeronimo v. Alliance Credit Union CA4/3
- People v. Sanchez CA4/3
- People v. Nguyen CA4/3
- Leiba v. Gann CA4/3
- Escamilla v. Encarnacion CA4/3
- In re Ma.V.
- People v. Kaye CA4/3
- People v. Lee CA4/3