Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Phillips v. Sanger Lumber Co.
- Campbell v. Wright
- Bank of Woodland v. Christie
- Grand Grove of United Ancient Order of Druids v. Garibaldi Grove No. 71
- Hoban v. Ryan
- People v. O'Brien
- Lougher v. Soto
- Board of Education v. Board of Trustees
- People v. Melendrez
- Gregory v. J. P. Clabrough's Executors
- McGeary v. Satchwell
- McGeary v. Satchwell
- McGeary v. Satchwell
- Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.
- Mallory v. See
- Main Street & Agricultural Park Railroad v. Los Angeles Traction Co.
- Shively v. Eureka Tellurium Gold Mining Co.
- Williams v. Long
- Palmer v. Continental Insurance Co.
- Horsman v. Allen
- Field v. Burr
- Field v. Burr
- Fogarty v. Fogarty
- Smith v. Stearns Rancho Co.
- Field v. Burr