Field v. Burr
D. W. FIELD v. JOHN BURR, Sheriff, etc., CAROLINE KOSTER, Intervenor and
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Outcome
- affirmed — the judgment is affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Smith (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Smith
SMITH, C.
Appeal from a judgment for intervenor in a suit for the recovery of personal property levied upon hy defendant, as sheriff, under attachment in favor of plaintiff against third party.
The findings are unusually full and explicit, hut in "the conclusions of law the word “plaintiff” is inadvertently used for “intervenor,” which is the ground urged for reversal. (Dougherty v. Ward, 89 Cal. 81.)
We recommend that the judgment he affirmed.
Gray, C., and Haynes, C., concurred.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed. McFarland, J., Temple, J., Henshaw, J.
Cites, in this corpus
- Dougherty v. Ward No. 13392 · 1890-05-16