gno.law

Smith

Justice, Court of Appeal · California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One · 1900–2025

F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 4 reversed 1 other 1

Areas

criminal 3 civil 3

By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases reviewed on appeal (every role)

  1. People v. Dlugitch CA4/2 E058256 · 2014-04-09 · criminal · affirmed
  2. The People v. Crabtree CA4/2 E058848 · 2013-09-30 · criminal · affirmed
  3. United States v. Jesus Ruben Nungaray 96-50424 · 1998-04-24 · criminal · affirmed
  4. Guardianship v. Mathews S.F. No. 6824. · 1914-12-16 · civil · other
  5. Scurich v. Ryan Civ. No. 846. · 1910-12-05 · civil · reversed
  6. Freiermuth v. Steigleman S.F. No. 1457. · 1900-11-01 · civil · affirmed