Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Andre A. v. Superior Court CA1/3
- People v. Centeno
- People v. Thompson CA1/3
- Thomas v. Denny's CA1/3
- In re C.M.
- Elizondo v. Livermore Sales and Service CA1/3
- In re C.M. CA1/3
- People v. Neal CA1/3
- People v. Randle CA1/3
- Wallace v. City of Oakland CA1/3
- People v. Gloede CA1/3
- People v. Boone CA1/3
- People v. Andrews CA1/3
- People v. Hicks CA1/3
- Doe v. Nell CA1/3
- People v. Alfonso Q. CA1/3
- Santora v. Santora CA1/3
- Chan v. Town of Atherton CA1/3
- County of Del Norte v. Britt
- People v. Mata CA1/3
- Askins v. CRST Expedited, Inc.
- People v. Zavala-Garcia CA1/3
- Busch v. Morgan CA1/3
- Bushey v. Jensen CA1/3
- People v. Corona CA1/3