Rodriguez
A+
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 6% of 35 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Ross v. Goldberger CA1/3
- Andre A. v. Superior Court CA1/3
- People v. Centeno
- Irvine v. Irvine
- People v. Gomez CA1/3
- Lewis v. Reales CA1/3
- People v. Thompson CA1/3
- Rosario v. Abdelhalim CA1/3
- People v. Ramey CA1/3
- People v. Wolpert CA1/3
- People v. Colvin CA1/3
- People v. Henderson CA1/3
- Thomas v. Denny's CA1/3
- In re C.M.
- Elizondo v. Livermore Sales and Service CA1/3
- S.F. Police Officers Assn. v. City and County of S.F. CA1/3
- People v. Turner CA1/3
- In re C.M. CA1/3
- People v. Neal CA1/3
- People v. Larsen CA1/3
- In re N.O. CA1/3
- People v. Randle CA1/3
- Opong-Mensah v. Marin Community College Dist. CA1/3
- Wallace v. City of Oakland CA1/3
- Ison v. Lara