William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Hartman v. Williams
- Cavender v. Guild
- Redman v. Bellamy
- Ramirez v. McCormick
- Cahoon v. Levy
- Garcia v. de Satrustegui
- People v. Thompson
- Fitzgerald v. Urton
- Gaskill v. Moore
- Kritzner v. Warner
- Vines v. Whitten
- Stearns v. Martin
- People v. Stuart
- Vermule v. Shaw
- Stoughton v. Swan
- Schuepler v. Evans
- McMinn v. Mayes
- Ray v. Armstrong
- Peachy v. Ritchie
- Corwin v. Patch
- Welch v. Tennent
- Youngs v. Bell
- Bessie v. Earle
- People v. Kohle
- Powell v. Ross