Welch v. Tennent
ARISTIDES WELCH v. THOMAS TENNENT, EDMUND SMITH
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Heydeneeldt (author), William J. Murray, Jr.
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydeneeldt
Mr. J. Heydeneeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.
Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred, The affidavit in this case is insufficient to show "that the Federal Court has jurisdiction of the suit. It does not appear that the contest is between a citizen of this State and citizens of a foreign State.
*204[204] *Tbis is sufficient to reverse the order; and we rest upon it, reserving for a future occasion to determine whether such a removal can in any event be permitted.
Order reversed.