Redman v. Bellamy
JOSHUA W. REDMAN v. GEORGE W. BELLAMY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Heydeneeldt (author), William J. Murray, Jr.
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydeneeldt
*Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt [250] delivered the opinion, of the Court.
Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.
The plaintiff claims under a Sheriff’s sale. The execution, was upon a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage, executed, and given by the defendant. He is therefore estopped from setting up the defenses attempted in this case. So we decided in the case of Tartar v. Hall, 3 Cal. 263.
Judgment affirmed.
Motion for a rehearing and review denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Tartar v. Hall · 1853-10-15