McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Sandoval CA4/1
- State of California v. Superior Court CA4/1
- People v. Tafoya CA4/1
- In re Hansen CA4/1
- Dynalectric v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- In re K.G. CA4/1
- In re Hansen CA4/1
- Friends of Aviara v. City of Carlsbad CA4/1
- Marcisz v. Ultrastar Cinemas CA4/1
- Suarez v. City of Corona
- San Diego Gas & Electric Company v. Schmidt
- In re Jordan W. CA4/1
- In re Edgar Z. CA4/1
- Chau v. Chau CA4/1
- People v. O'Rourke CA4/1
- People v. Smith CA4/1
- People v. Thomas CA4/1
- Riazati v. County of San Diego CA4/1
- People v. Castillo
- In re K.G. CA4/1
- San Diego Gas & Elec. Co. v. Schmidt CA4/1
- T.D. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- Kalicki v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA4/1
- People v. Neat CA4/1
- Katoozian v. Bank of America CA4/1