McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Holiday CA4/1
- People v. Aparicio
- People v. Aparicio
- Herrera v. Modular Properties CA4/1
- People v. Swaim CA4/1
- Ecolite Concrete USA v. G.S. Levine Ins. Services CA4/1
- Montgomery v. Klinedinst CA4/1
- People v. Smith CA4/1
- People v. Abalos CA4/1
- People v. Grewell CA4/1
- Maas v. Super. Court
- In re J.C. CA4/1
- Ramos v. Dillon CA4/1
- In re Juan Z. CA4/1
- Marriage of Phillips CA4/1
- People v. Grewell CA4/1
- Vartelas v. Universal Enterprises Internat. CA4/1
- People v. Gough CA4/1
- Margarita S. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- People v. Miskell CA4/1
- Sean & Shenassa v. Chicago Title Co. CA4/1
- People v. Farias CA4/1
- Ramos v. Dillon CA4/1
- People v. Aparicio
- People v. Willliams CA4/1