McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- P. v. Como CA4/1
- In re I.D. CA4/1
- P. v. Webb CA4/1
- Bergeron v. Payne CA4/1
- In re Omar M. CA4/1
- Happy Nails & Spa v. Su
- P. v. Martinez CA4/1
- Acuna v. San Diego Gas & Electric
- Sukumar v. Ballard CA4/1
- In re Devin C. CA4/1
- P. v. Jimenez CA4/1
- Bates v. Chicago Title Co. CA4/1
- P. v. Salih CA4/1
- In re Michelle T. CA4/1
- P. v. Jackson CA4/1
- In re T.F. CA4/1
- P. v. Wright CA4/1
- Drimmel v. SettlementOne CA4/1
- In re Hunter B. CA4/1
- Douglas M. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- P. v. Holloway CA4/1
- In re E.E. CA4/1
- In re A.B. CA4/1
- Washington v. Horvath CA4/1
- P. v. Jasso CA4/1