Linda Lopez
, District Court, S.D. California 2018–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 12 vacated 3 reversed 3 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 5 · 2026 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Burnell v. Hasan
- Salazar Arroyo v. LaRose
- Nosov v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
- Cohen v. San Diego State University
- Novo Nordisk A/S v. Goglia Nutrition, LLC
- Brooks v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC
- Stewart v. City of Carlsbad
- Rivera Anaya v. United States
- Zuniga v. United States
- United States v. City of San Diego
- Merhi v. Lowes Home Center, LLC
- Feng v. Lunaphore Technologies, SA
- Alamada Nagy v. Retail Capital LLC
- Thompson v. California Prison Industry Authority
- Boutros v. Bush
- Cummings v. GEICO General Insurance Company
- Lolicel (PTY) Ltd. v. Stanmar International [USA] Inc.
- Sims v. San Diego County Jail Medical
- Gritsenko v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
- Gritsenko v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
- (PC) Moore v. Espinoza