Linda Lopez
, District Court, S.D. California 2018–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 12 vacated 3 reversed 3 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 5 · 2026 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases reviewed on appeal (every role)
- Relator, LLC v. Erskine
- Robert Parker v. Vince Dequito
- Hammett v. Stern
- United States v. Claros
- Baron v. Staff Benefits Management, Inc.
- United States v. Mateo-Reyes
- Monster Energy Company v. Jiangsu Sitouguai Industry Co., Ltd.
- United States v. Viana-Hernandez
- Younes Yassein v. Scott Henderson
- Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. v. City of San Diego
- Jerome Grimes v. Sr Towing
- Youngevity International, Inc. v. Innov8tive Nutrition, Inc.
- Eric Bidwell v. County of San Diego
- Thomas Oliver v. Kristin Mihelic