King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Kidwell v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- People v. Amber S.
- Alameda County Social Services Agency v. Aura R.
- Baird v. County of Contra Costa
- People v. Lord
- People v. Moore
- Strauch v. Eyring
- Arendell v. Auto Parts Club, Inc.
- Nadel v. Regents of University of California
- Pederson v. Fini
- Neustrup v. Carter
- In Re Marriage of Fini
- In Re Marriage of Carter
- Langridge v. Oakland Unified School District
- Langridge v. Oakland Unified School Dist.
- Conrad v. Ball Corp.
- Surfrider Foundation v. California Coastal Commission
- People v. Shannon B.
- Ballard v. Taylor
- Calhoun v. Vallejo City Unified School District
- People v. Ibrahim
- County of Santa Clara v. Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose
- Campisi v. Superior Court
- People v. Howard
- Burgess v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals