King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- San Bernardino County Children & Family Services v. Kimberly L.
- Gray & Jimenez v. Jewish Federation of Palm Springs
- Eustice v. Eustice
- Marriage of Smith
- FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Reese
- Bocanegra v. Jakubowski
- Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. M.O.
- People v. Isom
- People v. Riley
- People v. Noriega
- Davis v. Sentinel Weekly News
- Save Our Uniquely Rural Com. Environment v. County of San Bernardino CA4/2
- Windsor Food Quality Co. v. The Underwriters of Lloyds of London CA4/2
- People v. Rekte
- The People v. Silva CA4/2
- Lewis Operating Corp. v. Superior Court
- People v. Christiana
- People v. Bell
- Iasu v. Smith
- People v. Thompson
- Davcon, Inc. v. Roberts & Morgan
- United States v. Juan Arthur Zaragoza
- United States v. Ricardo A. Bravo
- Milos Sovak, M.D. Biophysica, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., a Corporation of the Empire of Japan Cook Imaging Corporation, an Indiana Corporation
- United States v. Li Xiang Feng, United States of America v. Chen Biao, United States of America v. Tu Yu Piao, United States of America v. Hui Lin