King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Highland Springs Conference & Training Center v. City of Banning
- City of Corona v. AMG Outdoor Advertising CA4/2
- People v. Driver CA4/2
- Inland Oversight Committee v. City of Ontario
- Save Our Schools v. Barstow Unified School District Board of Education
- Alamo Recycling, LLC v. Anheuser Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc.
- Pasternack v. McCullough
- Windsor Food Quality v. Underwriters of Lloyds etc.
- Eriksson v. Nunnink
- Munoz v. Palm Springs Baking Co. CA4/2
- People v. Campbell
- Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group
- Hasso v. J & J Real Estate Holdings CA4/2
- People v. Sanchez
- People v. London
- Golden State v. Eastern Municipal Water Dist.
- Blythe v. County of Riverside CA4/2
- San Bernardino County Children & Family Services v. S.L.
- Roberson v. City of Rialto CA4/2
- J.J. v. E.C. CA4/2
- Ahn v. Kumho Tire U.S.A., Inc.
- Sharples v. Sharples
- In re S.N. CA4/2
- People v. Boatman
- The People v. Hernandez