King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a Corporation
- City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board
- Finch v. Brenda Raceway Corp.
- United States v. David Michael Kelley
- United States v. Manuel Bobadilla-Lopez
- McCoy v. Hearst Corp.
- United States v. Nicolas Herrera-Figueroa
- United States v. Ira Marvin Dickey
- People v. Ray
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior Court
- People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co.
- Stephens v. Montgomery Ward
- Gray v. Kircher
- Russ Building Partnership v. City & County of San Francisco
- Conservatorship of Smith
- Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co.
- People v. Ciraolo
- Service Employees International Union v. Superior Court
- Schultz v. County of Contra Costa