King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Southern California Edison Co. v. City of Victorville
- People v. Lawson
- Dwight R. v. Christy B.
- Daniels v. Sunrise Senior Living, Inc.
- People v. P.A.
- Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rialto
- People v. Bejasa
- Tuszynska v. Cunningham
- Gutierrez v. County of San Bernardino
- People v. Moomey
- Behr v. Redmond
- Martinez v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
- Riverside Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of Riverside
- People v. Moreno
- Erikson v. Nunnink
- Cherry Valley Pass Acres & Neighbors v. City of Beaumont
- People v. Poroj
- Clarendon America Insurance v. North American Capacity Insurance
- Beutz v. County of Riverside
- People v. Traugott
- People v. Becker
- People v. Trujillo
- Cooper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
- People v. Peyton
- Laabs v. Southern California Edison Co.