King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Lang v. Superior Court
- Estate of Cirone
- In Re Marriage of Neal
- People v. Pipitone
- Cosenza v. Kramer
- Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- People v. Pringle
- Pacific Intermountain Express v. National Union Fire Insurance
- Del Mar v. California Coastal Commission
- Bellm v. Bellia
- Moreno v. Fey Manufacturing Corp.
- People v. Russo
- People v. Hempstead
- Cotati Alliance for Better Housing v. City of Cotati
- Glorietta Foods, Inc. v. City of San Jose
- Rue-Ell Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Berkeley
- DERRICK J. v. Superior Court
- Forcum v. Forcum
- San Jose Teachers Assn. v. Allen
- Harper v. Kaiser Cement Corp.
- In Re Marriage of Johnson
- In Re Marriage of Burlini
- Buran Equipment Co. v. H & C INVESTMENT CO.
- People v. Natale
- Peerless Stages, Inc. v. Santa Clara County Transit District