King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- In Re Marriage of Rosson
- Keyhea v. Rushen
- In Re Marriage of Downes
- In Re Marriage of Delgado
- People v. Perez
- Fiore v. Alvord
- Lewis v. Regional Center of the East Bay
- Carol v. Wolfe
- In Re Marriage of Wolfe
- Dowell v. County of Contra Costa
- People v. Olivas
- People v. Coutu
- People v. Acosta
- Kosowski v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- People v. James
- In Re Marriage of Hatch
- Novi v. City of Pacifica
- American Olean Tile Co. v. Schultze
- In Re Marriage of Stich
- City of Santa Rosa v. Industrial Waste & Debris Box Rentals, Inc.
- In Re Marriage of Bergman
- People v. Clark
- People v. Madrid
- People v. Broad
- Lebbos v. State Bar