Andrew G. Schopler
, District Court, S.D. California 2016–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 12 vacated 1 dismissed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 10 remanded 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University
- Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
- Vashisht-Rota v. Reyes
- Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
- Woodway USA, Inc. v. LifeCORE Fitness, LLC
- Williams v. Allison
- Stewart v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
- Aragon v. DZR Group Inc.
- Thomas v. Hill
- Ewing v. Gitre
- Ellman v. County of San Diego
- Hodroff v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Bo v. Board of Regents of the University of California
- Cowan v. San Diego County
- Stevens v. CDCR Director
- Green v. Kijakazi
- Smith v. TransUnion
- Yeargan v. Kijakazi
- Reel v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Kakowski v. SGT Gonzales
- Aragon v. DZR Group Inc.
- PPNP LLC v. Arya
- Sosa v. Bird
- Camargo Alejo v. Vista Detention Facility
- Bonilla v. San Diego County Court Clerk's Office