Whaley
F--
provisional — 67% — 2.0 of 3 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 3 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
2cases reviewed on appeal
3opinions authored
9panels sat on (not as author)
—2 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1998 1 · 1997 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People of the State of Calif. v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners
- United States v. Omar Dominguez-Valencia
- Richard Thompson v. National Steel and Shipbuildin
- United States v. Signed Personal Check No. 730 of Mesle
- Brooks v. Motsenbocker Advanced Developments, Inc.
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enzo Guel ROMEO, Defendant-Appellant