gno.law

Whaley

Justice, Court of Appeal · 1997–2015

F--
provisional — 67% — 2.0 of 3 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 3 so far

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

2cases reviewed on appeal
3opinions authored
9panels sat on (not as author)
—2 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 2

Areas

criminal 1 civil 1

By year: 1998 1 · 1997 1 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases

  1. California Wholesale Electricity Antitrust Litigation Public Utility District No. 1 v. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc. 3:02-cr-01993 · 2003-01-06 · criminal
  2. United States v. Nathan Reese 96-50187 · 1998-05-28 · criminal · affirmed