Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Cuen
- In re A.D. CA4/3
- People v. Hatfield CA4/3
- People v. Soul CA4/3
- People v. Pintor and Valtierra CA4/3
- Mobile Medical Services for Physicians & Advanced Practice Nurses, Inc. v. Rajaram
- Tran v. Derakhshanian CA4/3
- People v. Mendoza CA4/3
- People v. Fitz CA4/3
- People v. Pintor and Valtierra CA4/3
- Grace v. Mansourian
- Peterson v. Rubio CA4/3
- People v. Anaya CA4/3
- Grace v. Mansourian CA4/3
- Kaghazchi v. Mercedes-Benz Financial CA4/3
- In re Christopher C. CA4/3
- People v. Venegas CA4/3
- People v. Oudin and Gibbs CA4/3
- People v. Zamudio CA4/3
- Sukhov v. Sukhov CA4/3
- People v. Rogel CA4/3
- People v. Duran CA4/3
- Sukhov v. Sukhov CA4/3
- People v. Delacerda
- People v. Sledge