Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Rivas CA4/3
- Piana v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA4/3
- Tran v. Integra LifeSciences Corp. CA4/3
- Harbor Marina v. Golden Hills Properties CA4/3
- Marriage of Jones-Geeting and Geeting CA4/3
- Marriage of Morcos-Jewgieniew and Jewgieniew CA4/3
- People v. Aldana CA4/3
- People v. Luker CA4/3
- Shelton v. Larson CA4/3
- People v. Valadez CA4/3
- People v. Johnson CA4/3
- Williams v. Prime Healthcare La Palma, LLC CA4/3
- People v. Carson CA4/3
- People v. Solis CA4/3
- Universal Interactive v. Greenberg Traurig CA4/3
- Orange County Social Services Agency v. K.K.
- People v. MacDaniel CA4/3
- In re K.R. CA4/3
- People v. Dickson CA4/3
- People v. Randolph CA4/3
- People v. Walker CA4/3
- In re Diego v. CA4/3
- People v. Navarro CA4/3
- Sadr v. Sabet CA4/3
- People v. Erro CA4/3