Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Odom
- Whitten v. California State Board of Optometry
- Canal Oil Co. v. National Oil Co.
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.
- Retailers' Credit Ass'n v. Superior Court
- Strath v. City of Santa Rosa
- LaFranchi v. City of Santa Rosa
- Mundy v. Marshall
- Texas Company v. Todd
- Ginn v. Podesta
- Wedum-Aldahl Co. v. Miller
- Reclamation District No. 833 v. Quigley
- McDonald v. Superior Court
- Fraser v. Carman-Ryles
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lane Mortgage Co.
- See v. Joughin
- Gardini v. Arakelian
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. Chotiner
- La Rosa v. Glaze
- Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior Court
- Watson v. Commonwealth Insurance of New York
- Alpha Stores, Ltd. v. You Bet Mining Co.
- Alpha Stores, Ltd. v. You Bet Mining Co.
- Alpha Stores, Ltd. v. You Bet Mining Co.
- Stockton Morris Plan Co. v. Carpenter