Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Guy v. Suntrust Bank Holding Co. CA4/3
- People v. Kauffman CA4/3
- People v. Murphy CA4/3
- People v. Ramirez CA4/3
- People v. Soriano CA4/3
- Masimo Corp. v. Bauche CA4/3
- People v. Carpenter CA4/3
- People v. Diaz-Garcia CA4/3
- People v. Hergott CA4/3
- People v. Martin CA4/3
- People v. Chapin CA4/3
- People v. Quiroz-Muniz CA4/3
- Marriage of Cantarella and Herrera CA4/3
- People v. Figueroa CA4/3
- People v. Rivera CA4/3
- People v. Aguilar CA4/3
- People v. Figueroa CA4/3
- People v. Scott CA4/3
- People v. Price CA4/3
- People v. Sandoval CA4/3
- In re R.W. CA4/3
- People v. Price CA4/3
- Smith v. SATRA CA4/3
- People v. Lish CA4/3
- Ramirez v. CL Education CA4/3