Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- United States v. Mallides
- Boag v. Johnson
- Vinot Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Pasadena
- People v. Chain
- Farr v. Superior Court
- People v. Superior Court
- Nelson v. City of Los Angeles
- People v. Mascarenas
- Esgro Central, Inc. v. General Insurance
- People v. Davis
- People v. Temple
- Modern Management Method v. Superior Court
- People v. Heredia
- Donald v. Garry
- People v. Grossman
- Downen v. Chafee
- Klang v. Shell Oil Co.
- People v. Johnson
- Gregory v. Laird
- McGarr v. Hayford
- Department of Public Social Services v. Robinson
- Crowley Launch & Tugboat Co. v. County of Los Angeles
- In Re Biggs
- People v. Shoemaker
- People v. Yniguez