Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- PEOPLE, DEPT. PUB. WKS. v. Southern Pac. Trans. Co.
- City of Los Angeles v. A.E.C. Los Angeles, Inc.
- Wheat v. Hall
- Rickson v. Ward
- Arnesen v. Raymond Lee Organization, Inc.
- Tivens v. Assessment Appeals Board
- Sambrano v. Superior Court
- Ladd v. State Board of Equalization
- Luna v. Star of India
- Thoren v. Johnston & Washer
- McFarland v. United States
- In Re Marriage of Wall
- United States v. DeBetham
- Continental Vinyl Products Corp. v. Mead Corp.
- People v. Christian
- People v. Goldbach
- Milstein v. Security Pacific National Bank
- People v. Gomez
- Bemis v. Whalen
- Appelgate v. Dumke
- United States v. Barnawell
- ARMORLITE LENS COMPANY v. Campbell
- United States v. Perry
- Robinson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
- United States v. Espinoza