Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Chandler CA4/3
- People v. Vo CA4/3
- Hirzallah v. The Regents of the University of Cal. CA4/3
- Marriage of Koury CA4/3
- In re M.G. CA4/3
- People v. Del Rosario CA4/3
- People v. Martinez CA4/3
- Dounel v. Duel CA4/3
- Galvin v. Vu CA4/3
- Just a Fluke, Inc. v. Litalien CA4/3
- Vaccaro v. Systellex, Inc. CA4/3
- T.F. v. Superior Court CA4/3
- In re C.A. CA4/3
- S.D. v. J.M. CA4/3
- Real Properties Network v. D'Alessio CA4/3
- In re Flores CA4/3
- Knight v. South Orange Community College Dist.
- People v. Flores CA4/3
- Tiger Loans v. Hao CA4/3
- People v. Labudis CA4/3
- People v. Vallejo CA4/3
- People v. Lopez CA4/3
- Marriage of Pallo CA4/3
- Reiner v. Cox Communications Cal., LLC CA4/3
- Protect Our Homes and Hills v. County of Orange CA4/3