Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- P. v. Villapando CA4/3
- P. v. Rowman CA4/3
- P. v. Calvo CA4/3
- P. v. Fraga CA4/3
- P. v. Montiel CA4/3
- P. v. Edwards CA4/3
- P. v. Lemus CA4/3
- In re Nathan P. CA4/3
- Kuehnel v. PHH Mortgage CA4/3
- P. v. Alvarez CA4/3
- Spyksma v. Sousamian CA4/3
- P. v. Sanchez CA4/3
- P. v. Avetoom CA4/3
- Lobel Financial v. Baltazar CA4/3
- P. v. Gonzalez CA4/3
- People v. Martinez CA4/3
- People v. Chambers CA4/3
- James Ray Moore v. Derrick Ollison
- United States v. Juvenile Female
- Evans v. Grossmont Union High School District
- United States v. Kory Ray Smith
- Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
- United States v. Jose Bravo-Diaz
- Thrifty Oil Co. v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association
- Pacord, Inc. v. United States of America a & E Industries, Inc.