Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Foust CA4/3
- Herrera v. A&P Auto Sales CA4/3
- People v. Butler CA4/3
- Yildiz v. AKW Fueling CA4/3
- Solus Industrial v. Super. Ct.
- In re Santos G. CA4/3
- Marriage of Foladpour and Hashemi CA4/3
- People v. Daly CA4/3
- Arreola v. One More Productions CA4/3
- Sharifpour v. Le
- JCM Farming v. Fantasy Balloon Flights CA4/3
- Ponce v. Philco Construction CA4/3
- People v. Sanchez
- Amanda F. v. Super. Ct. CA4/3
- In re S.S. CA4/3
- Sharifpour v. Le CA4/3
- V.C. v. Super. Ct. CA4/3
- A.C. v. Superior Court CA4/3
- Mac Beam, Inc. v. Cadovimex USA GJ Trade Co. CA4/3
- In re Christopher C. CA4/3
- People v. Farias CA4/3
- Domingo Villas v. The Ryan Firm CA4/3
- In re E.A. CA4/3
- People v. Aparicio CA4/3
- Salah v. St. Joseph Hosp. of Orange CA4/3