Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Bowles CA4/3
- People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co. CA4/3
- In re Andrew v. CA4/3
- Sampson v. The Richardson Group CA4/3
- In re Emil K. CA4/3
- Jackson v. Hoxie CA4/3
- Marriage of Pham-Held and Held CA4/3
- People v. Bryan CA4/3
- Gallegos v. Kia Motors CA4/3
- Susoeff v. Michie CA4/3
- People v. Moore CA4/3
- People v. Vilchis CA4/3
- R.G. v. San Bernadino City Unified School Dist. CA4/3
- Solus Industrial Innovations v. Super. Ct.
- In re Andrew v. CA4/3
- People v. Robey CA4/3
- People v. Gomez CA4/3
- Dorame v. R2W CA4/3
- Solus Industrial Innovations, LLC v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Figueroa CA4/3
- People v. White CA4/3
- People v. Naposki CA4/3
- In re Christensen CA4/3
- People v. Mihajson CA4/3
- People v. Duong CA4/3