Thompson
B
99% — 70.5 of 71 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 28% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1995 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Marriage of Nava-Diaz and Diaz CA4/3
- People v. Pinski CA4/3
- In re Emily M. CA4/3
- People v. Moran CA4/3
- People v. Antes CA4/3
- People v. Purdie CA4/3
- The Joint Equity Committee v. Genovese CA4/3
- Yu v. Landmark American Ins. Co. CA4/3
- People v. James CA4/3
- People v. Melendez CA4/3
- People v. Valencia CA4/3
- People v. Gates CA4/3
- Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School Dist. v. N. Orange Cty. Regional Occupational Program CA4/3
- Estate of Katz CA4/3
- People v. Le CA4/3
- People v. Maher CA4/3
- People v. Tor CA4/3
- Salcedo v. Bank of America CA4/3
- People v. Wilson CA4/3
- People v. Boyzo CA4/3
- People v. Garcia CA4/3
- People v. Morales CA4/3
- Wells Fargo Bank Nat. Assn. v. Mirrafati CA4/3
- Adoption of S.L. CA4/1
- N.D. v. Regional Center of Orange County CA4/3