Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Nunez v. Nicholson
- People v. Mandujano CA5
- Cockren v. Brown CA5
- Cockren v. Brown CA5
- People v. Maynor CA5
- People v. Yang CA5
- In re D.S. CA5
- In re Y.T. CA5
- People v. Irvin CA5
- People v. Jeronimo CA5
- People v. Irvin CA5
- Ocaranza v. C.H.L. EMS CA5
- People v. Lipsey CA5
- Mayfaire Homeowners Assn. v. Deol CA5
- People v. Torales CA5
- Reyes v. Beneficial State Bank
- People v. Bravo CA5
- People v. Lara CA5
- People v. Simentel CA5
- People v. Moberly CA5
- Wonderful Orchards v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board CA5
- People v. Sanchez-Garcia CA5
- People v. Lara CA5
- Wade v. Starbucks Corp. CA5
- J&A Mash & Barrel, LLC v. Super. Ct.