gno.law

Smith

Justice, Court of Appeal · California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One · 1900–2025

F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 4 reversed 1 other 1

Areas

criminal 3 civil 3

By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases sat on (every role)

  1. Humphry v. Buena Vista Water Co. Civ. No. 122. · 1905-12-29 · civil · other
  2. Kessler v. Kessler Civ. No. 109. · 1905-12-20 · civil · other
  3. Brill v. Carsley Civ. No. 90. · 1905-12-04 · civil · other
  4. McConnell v. Fox Civ. No. 96. · 1905-12-02 · civil · affirmed
  5. Armantage v. Superior Court No. 12. · 1905-06-05 · civil · other
  6. Hunt v. Hammel L.A. No. 1195. · 1904-03-11 · civil · other
  7. Pollard v. Harlow S.F. No. 2294. · 1903-01-24 · civil · other
  8. Ventura Land & Power Co. v. Meiners L.A. No. 803. · 1902-04-12 · civil · other